<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea?</title>
        <link>http://reelchicksfish.com/topic/1590/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Is it bad to cut the fuel supply to my little 2 cycle outboard?&nbsp; I have been doing this whenever I know I'm not going to be going out in it for awhile, in hopes of not gumming up the carb.&nbsp; ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ceco@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:39:57 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:38:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8519/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8519</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><strong class="quote-title">dancudayo wrote:</strong><hr>It always seems like a good idea to do to me, just thought like Frank said, no oil no lubrication.  I don't know, sort of seems to me like the engine dies right away without the gas/oil mix so maybe there isn't any harm.</blockquote>The question is about running a small 2 cycle engine dry after use.&nbsp; The pros and cons have been discussed dozens of times but I have never read or heard a real definitive answer.&nbsp; However, as dancudayo mentions, the engine dies right away without the mixture.&nbsp; That is a very important point.&nbsp; When you purposely run a small 2cycle out of gas, you are doing it at idle speed, and residual oil from the mixture will keep the engine from actually turning dry or seizing.&nbsp; The real possibility of damage is when you are using the engine under load at relatively high RPMs and you suddenly run out of fuel.&nbsp; Then, the potential for damage is greatly increased.&nbsp;... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Sleepless)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8519</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:38:40 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8518/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8518</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ for the federal govt. to run the same experiment as you, they would have to add about 4 zeroes to your cost figure. Yup 1.2 million should do the trick.  You just need a lobbyist to get it for you, lol.  I for one can't wait to hear your results.  <br>
<br>
Mike ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wishiniwasfishin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8518</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:46:13 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8517/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8517</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sound information! Frank <br>As far as those of you running them Dry there is a risk. I warned my neighbor, he has been burning out the fuel for 15 years same engine....90hp Johnson<br>this year was the first he had to have the carbs done--- so apparently there is enough Fuel residue from ethanol left behind to corrode up the carbs anyway.<br>IF you have to run em dry and purge all lines I would suggest a shot of spray winterizing fogging&nbsp; oil directly into the carb itself for lubrication and prtection just before it begins to stall out. The top cyl usually runs dryer anyway and is usually the first to go... for some gravity reason- oil doesn't like to reach the top bearing. Without lubrication the rubber bearing seals will crack and dry out which then it sucks more Air than it needs causing it to run lean<br>and wear the engine prematurely two strokes are usually only good for 2500 3000 hrs before a rebuild is needed so why make it 1500-1800<br>Not only that your Crank... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jigmaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8517</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:35:51 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8516/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8516</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It always seems like a good idea to do to me, just thought like Frank said, no oil no lubrication.  I don't know, sort of seems to me like the engine dies right away without the gas/oil mix so maybe there isn't any harm. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (dancudayo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8516</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:15:45 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8513/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8513</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Makes perfect sense Frank!  Thanks! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wishiniwasfishin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8513</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:38:23 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8511/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8511</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Before Ethanol, BE<span style="background-color: rgb(204, 0, 51); color: rgb(204, 0, 51);"></span>, it wasn't recommended to run the engine out of fuel, since when you ran out of gas, you ran out of oil, which is the only lubrication getting to your rings and bearings.&nbsp; <br><br>BUT, <span style="background-color: rgb(204, 0, 51);"></span> After Ethanol ,AE I've been running the fuel out of my carbs and fuel lines in my engines if I know it will be sitting for more than a month.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; This keeps the alcohol from eating up the insides of my fuel lines, and having the fuel separate, creating corrosion in the carb bowl.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><span style="text-decoration: underline;">I wouldn't do this on a regular basis, but once in a while shouldn't be a problem.</span><br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Frank)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8511</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:30:32 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8510/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><strong class="quote-title">retiredmrbill wrote:</strong><hr>I am not a mechanic either but I have always have been told that running out the fuel when you were not going to use it was a good idea. It is what is recommended for engines that are going to be stored for the winter.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-confused005.gif" height="15" width="37">
<p><br></p></blockquote>I agree with Bill.&nbsp; I began using 2 cycle engines in the Midwest about 60 years ago.&nbsp; Through the years I have owned countless 2 cycle and&nbsp; 4 cycle engines on lawn equipment outboard motors, snow throwers tillers, etc. These were all seasonal use equipment, and it was essential that these be run dry at the end of the season.&nbsp; Neighbors that didn't ended up with varnished up carbs (or worse) while mine would start up right away.&nbsp; Those were in the days when all outboards and other gasoline powered equipment were equipped with sediment bowls and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Sleepless)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8510</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:29:01 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8505/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8505</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I am not a mechanic either but I have always have been told that running out the fuel when you were not going to use it was a good idea. It is what is recommended for engines that are going to be stored for the winter.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-confused005.gif" width="37" height="15">
<p><br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (retiredmrbill)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8505</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:58:27 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8504/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-#reply-8504</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Not a mechanic, but I inherited a 2 cycle lawnmower that had a fuel shutoff.  We used to cut the fuel, and let it run out every time, and that motor ran like a top.  Interested to hear what the pro's have to say on this as well.  I would think it would be good to not have any extra gas/oil just sitting in the motor. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wishiniwasfishin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/reply/8504</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:26:38 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ running 2 cycle engine dry - Bad Idea? ]]></title>
			<link>http://reelchicksfish.com/topic/1590/running-2-cycle-engine-dry-Bad-Idea-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Is it bad to cut the fuel supply to my little 2 cycle outboard?&nbsp; I have been doing this whenever I know I'm not going to be going out in it for awhile, in hopes of not gumming up the carb.&nbsp; ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (dancudayo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://reelchicksfish.com/topic/1590</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:39:57 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
